Amadieu, F. y Salmerón, L. (2014). Concept Maps for Comprehension and Navigation of Hypertexts. En D. Ifenthaler y R. Hanewald (Eds.), Digital Knowledge Maps in Education (pp. 41-59). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3178-7_3.
Anderson, R. C. (1978). Schema-Directed Processes in Language Comprehension. En A. M. Lesgold, J. W. Pellegrino, S. D. Fokkema y R. Glaser (Eds.), Cognitive Psychology and Instruction (pp. 67-82). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2535-2_8.
Anderson, R. C. y Biddle, W. B. (1975). On Asking People Questions about What They are Reading. En G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (vol. 9, pp. 89-132). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60269-8.
Anderson, R. C. et al. (1977). Frameworks for Comprehending Discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14(4), 367-381. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312014004367.
Aristóteles (1982). Tratados de lógica (Órganon), I. Gredos.
Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326548.
Barnett, S. M. y Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612.
Baron, N. S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford University Press. https://tinyurl.com/2zkmkyn9.
Barrio-Cantalejo et al. (2008). Validación de la Escala INFLESZ para evaluar la legibilidad de los textos dirigidos a pacientes. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 31(2), 135-152.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617-645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
Barsalou, L. W., Wilson, C. D. y Hasenkamp, W. (2010). On the vices of nominalization and the virtues of contextualizing. En The mind in context (pp. 334-360). Guilford Press New York. https://tinyurl.com/52nurmxw.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G. y Omanson, R. C. (1987). The effects and uses of diverse vocabulary instructional techniques. En The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 147-163). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Beck, I. L. et al. (1991). Revising Social Studies Text from a Text-Processing Perspective: Evidence of Improved Comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(3), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/747763.
Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C. y McKeown, M. G. (1982). An instructional redesign of reading lessons: Effects on comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(4), 462-481. https://doi.org/10.2307/747566.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2001). Analogical Problem Construction and Transfer in Mathematical Problem Solving. Educational Psychology, 21(2), 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410020043841.
Bernth, A. (1998). Easy English. En D. Farwell, L. Gerber y E. Hovy (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas: Technical Papers (pp. 158-163). Springer. https://aclanthology.org/1998.amta-papers.15/.
Biber, D. y Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for academic purposes, 9(1), 2-20.
Billig, M. (2008). The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalization. Discourse & Society, 19(6), 783-800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508095894.
Black, J. B. y Bower, G. H. (1980). Story understanding as problem-solving. Poetics, 9(1-3), 223-250.
Blasie, M. A. (2023). Regulating plain language. Wis. L. Rev., 687.
Borgobello, A., Sartori, M. y Sanjurjo, L. (2018). Concepciones de docentes sobre los estudiantes y sus prácticas pedagógicas. Educación y Educadores, 21(1), 27-48.
Bott, S. y Saggion, H. (2011). An unsupervised alignment algorithm for text simplification corpus construction. Proceedings of the Workshop on Monolingual Text-To-Text Generation, 20-26. https://aclanthology.org/W11-1603.pdf.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination. Stanford University Press. https://tinyurl.com/y5j2mz4e.
Bransford, J. D. y Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of Some Problems of Comprehension. En Visual Information Processing (pp. 383-438). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-170150-5.50014-7.
Brown, T. B. et al. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners (arXiv:2005.14165). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165.
Burin, D. et al. (2016). Desarrollos recientes sobre habilidades digitales y comprensión lectora en entornos digitales. Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad, 6(1), 191-206.
Burin, D. I. (2020). Comprensión de texto digital. En La comprensión lectora a principios del siglo XXI. Texto, multimedia e Internet. Teseo.
Butler, J. (2007). El género en disputa: El feminismo y la subversión de la identidad. Ediciones Paidós Ibérica. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/items/32d37615-a66f-4705-80fa-18125d3a837f.
Cain, K. (1996). Story knowledge and comprehension skill. En Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 167-192). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J. y Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31.
Canning, Y. y Tait, J. (1999). Syntactic simplification of newspaper text for aphasic readers. ACM SIGIR’99 Workshop on Customised Information Delivery, 6-11. https://www.academia.edu/download/30821363/10.1.1.24.8334.pdf#page=8.
Carr, N. (2011). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. W. W. Norton & Company.
Carretero González, C. (2024). Perspectiva jurídica del derecho a comprender como derecho a recibir comunicaciones comprensibles. Revista de Llengua i Dret, 30-57. https://doi.org/10.58992/rld.i82.2024.4307.
Carroll, J. A. et al. (1999). Simplifying text for language-impaired readers. Ninth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 269-270. https://aclanthology.org/E99-1042.pdf.
Castells, M. (1996). La era de la información: Economía, sociedad y cultura (vol. 1). Siglo XXI editores.
Castells, M. (1997). La sociedad red (2.a ed., vol. 1). Alianza Editorial. http://archive.org/details/la-sociedad-red-castells.
Catrambone, R. y Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1147-1156. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1147.
Caturegli, C. y D’Angelo, V. S. (2022). Conceptos computacionales con Arduino. Teseo. https://www.teseopress.com/conceptosarduino/.
Chandrasekar, R., Doran, C. y Bangalore, S. (1996). Motivations and methods for text simplification. COLING 1996 volume 2: The 16th international conference on computational linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/C96-2183.pdf.
Chase, W. G. y Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4(1), 55-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2.
Chi, M., Feltovich, P. J. y Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive science, 5(2), 121-152.
Cirilo, R. K. (1981). Referential coherence and text structure in story comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(3), 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90505-3.
Cisneros, L. (2012). La reducción inevitable: Sobre la definición en el discurso académico. En Retóricas del decir. Lenguaje, verdad y creencia en la escritura académica. FHUMYAR Ediciones, Facultad de Humanidades y Artes – UNR.
Clark, H. H., Haviland, S. y Freedle, R. O. (1977). Discourse production and comprehension. Ablex Publishing Corporation. https://tinyurl.com/5n6sna9r.
Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting Reading Comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of Offline Reading Skills, Online Reading Skills, and Prior Knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11421979.
Comité de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales (1999). Observación general n.o 13: El derecho a la educación (artículo 13 del Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales) (Observación general N.° 13). Naciones Unidas.
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación (CSJN), 2640/2023 (2023). https://www.csjn.gob.ar/documentos/descargar?ID=139952.
Coster, W. y Kauchak, D. (2011). Learning to simplify sentences using Wikipedia. Proceedings of the workshop on monolingual text-to-text generation, 1-9. https://aclanthology.org/W11-1601.pdf.
Crossley, S. A., Allen, D. y McNamara, D. S. (2012). Text simplification and comprehensible input: A case for an intuitive approach. Language Teaching Research, 16(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811423456.
Cutts, M. (2020). Oxford guide to plain English. Oxford university press. https://tinyurl.com/4dptvs9z.
D’Angelo, V. (2020). Técnicas de abstracción tardía para promover la transferencia. FLACSO. Sede Académica Argentina. http://hdl.handle.net/10469/17136.
D’Angelo, V. (2023). El uso de ejemplos ilustrativos durante el aprendizaje de conceptos declarativos. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. http://hdl.handle.net/11086/549911.
D’Angelo, V. (2025a). Algoritmos, estructuras de datos y procesos de pensamiento. Teseo. https://www.teseopress.com/algoritmos/.
D’Angelo, V. (2025b). La escritura en Ingeniería informática: Una herramienta para la comunicación, la abstracción y el conocimiento. Aula Universitaria, (26). https://doi.org/10.14409/au.2025.26.e0057.
D’Angelo, V. (en prensa). Comprensión del texto técnico en electrónica y programación. Evaluación de estrategia pedagógica en el nivel técnico secundaria. Entre Ciencia e Ingeniería.
D’Angelo, V. y Díaz, P. (2025). Del uso instrumental al enfoque epistémico: Repensar la tecnología desde las ciencias del aprendizaje. Revista IRICE, (49). https://doi.org/10.35305/revistairice.vi49.2066.
D’Angelo, V. y Trench, J. M. (2024). Aprendizaje de conceptos abstractos en estudiantes que emplean el Español como segunda lengua: Efectos de la complejidad de las definiciones. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (RACC), 16 (Extra 3, suplemento septiembre), 224-225. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9833469.
D’Angelo, V. y Trench, M. (2020). Enhancing distant analogical retrieval via generating abstract redescriptions of the target. En Conceptual Abstraction and Analogy in Natural and Artificial Systems Symposium of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Washington, DC.
Delgado, P. et al. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003.
Dras, M. (1999). Tree Adjoining Grammar and the Reluctant Paraphrasing of Text. Sydney Macquarie University. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1134889.
Dubay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readability. ERIC. Institute of Education Sciences. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed490073.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Discourse and Social Change. Wiley.
Ferreiro, E. (2011). Pasado y presente de los verbos leer y escribir. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532.
Fowler, R. (2013). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/mpusxmbz (obra original publicada en 1991).
Fowler, R. et al. (2018). Language and control. Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/5888fwnt (obra original publicada en 1979).
Gao, L. et al. (2020). The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling (arXiv:2101.00027). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.00027.
Gardner, H. (2016). La mente no escolarizada. Cómo piensan los niños y cómo deberían enseñar las escuelas. Paidós.
Gazzaley, A. y Rosen, L. D. (2016). The distracted mind: Ancient brains in a high-tech world (pp. xv, 286). Boston Review.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2). https://tinyurl.com/yjrjzybw.
Gentner, D. y Kurtz, K. J. (2005). Relational categories. En Categorization inside and outside the laboratory: Essays in honor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 151-175). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11156-009.
Goldwater, M. B. y Gentner, D. (2015). On the acquisition of abstract knowledge: Structural alignment and explication in learning causal system categories. Cognition, 137, 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.001.
Goldwater, M. B. y Schalk, L. (2016). Relational categories as a bridge between cognitive and educational research. Psychological Bulletin, 142(7), 129-157.
González-Sordé, M. y Matamala, A. (2024). Empirical evaluation of Easy Language recommendations: A systematic literature review from journal research in Catalan, English, and Spanish. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23(3), 1369-1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00975-2.
Gowers, E. (1954). Complete plain words. Internet Archive. http://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.28753.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M. y Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371-395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371.
Graiewski, M. (2019). El lenguaje claro en el ámbito jurídico. SAIJ. https://tinyurl.com/5994u9v6.
Hackemann, T., Heine, L. y Höttecke, D. (2022).
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The Language of science. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. y Martin, J. R. (2003). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/yc7mfums.
Hayes, D. P. y Ahrens, M. G. (1988). Vocabulary simplification for children: A special case of ‘motherese’? Journal of Child Language, 15(2), 395-410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012411.
Hazzan, O. (1999). Reducing abstraction level when learning abstract algebra concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(1), 71-90.
Hazzan, O. (2003). How students attempt to reduce abstraction in the learning of mathematics and in the learning of computer science. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 95-122.
Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & McCrudden, M. T. (2023). The effects of text structure on students’ use of comprehension strategies and cognitive outcomes during science text processing. Frontiers in Education, 8.
Inclusion Europe (Ed.) (2009). European standards for making information easy to read and understand. Inclusion Europe.
Injoque Ricle, I. et al. (2012). Memoria de trabajo y vocabulario: Un modelo de interacción entre los componentes del modelo de Baddeley y el sistema de información verbal cristalizada. Cuadernos de Neuropsicología, 6(1), 33-45.
Isakson, C. S. y Spyridakis, J. H. (1995). Nominalizations: Effect on recall and comprehension. 1995 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. IPCC 95 Proceedings. Smooth Sailing to the Future, 203-206. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.1995.554908.
Isakson, C. y Spyridakis, J. (2003). The Influence of Semantics and Syntax on What Readers Remember. Technical Communication, 50, 538-553.
Jackson, L. M. (2023, agosto 17). The “-ification” of Everything. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-ification-of-everything.
Jonnalagadda, S. et al. (2009). Towards Effective Sentence Simplification for Automatic Processing of Biomedical Text. En M. Ostendorf, M. Collins, S. Narayanan, D. W. Oard y L. Vanderwende (Eds.), Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Companion Volume: Short Papers (pp. 177-180). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/N09-2045/.
Just, M. A. y Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.
Justicia.ar (2021). Lenguaje claro. https://www.justicia.ar/iniciativas/lenguaje-claro.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
Kendeou, P. et al. (2016). Reading Comprehension: Core Components and Processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215624707.
Kendeou, P. et al. (2014). A Cognitive View of Reading Comprehension: Implications for Reading Difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12025.
Kieras, D. E. (1985). Thematic Processes in the Comprehension of Technical Prose. En Understanding Expository Text. Routledge.
Kimble, J. (1996). Writing for dollars, writing to please. Scribes J. Leg. Writing, 6, 1.
Kimble, J. (2012). Writing for dollars, writing to please: The case for plain language in business, government, and law. Carolina Academic Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130285377538206720.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W. y Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90036-4.
Kintsch, W. y Kozminsky, E. (1977). Summarizing stories after reading and listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(5), 491-499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.69.5.491.
Kintsch, W. et al. (1975). Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 14(2), 196-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80065-X.
Kintsch, W. y Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. En The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209-226). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch12.
Kintsch, W. y van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363.
Klauda, S. y Guthrie, J. (2008). Relationships of Three Components of Reading Fluency to Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310.
Lakoff, G. (2024). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press (obra original publicada en 1987).
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Lanham, R. A. (1987). Revising prose. New York: Macmillan Pub. Co.; London: Collier Macmillan. http://archive.org/details/revisingprose0000lanh.
León, J. A. (2001). Las inferencias en la comprensión e interpretación del discurso: Un análisis para su estudio e investigación. Revista signos, 34(49-50), 113-125.
Lesgold, A. M., Roth, S. F. y Curtis, M. E. (1979). Foregrounding effects in discourse comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 18(3), 291-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90164-6.
Leu, D. et al. (2017). New Literacies: A Dual-Level Theory of the Changing Nature of Literacy, Instruction, and Assessment. Journal of Education, 197(2), 1-18.
Linderholm, T. et al. (2000). Effects of causal text revisions on more- and less-skilled readers’ comprehension of easy and difficult texts. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 525-556. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1804_4.
Long, M. H. y Ross, S. (1993). Modifications That Preserve Language and Content. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED371576.
Maaß, C. (2020). Easy language–plain language–easy language plus: Balancing comprehensibility and acceptability. Frank & Timme. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/42089.
Macbeth, G. E. y Razumiejczyk, E. (2019). El lenguaje psicológico en el derecho penal y la Constitución de la Nación Argentina. Acta Psiquiátrica y Psicológica de América Latina, 65(2). https://tinyurl.com/252x9ahx.
Macbeth, G. E. y Yuan, M. S. (2025). El giro retórico de Wittgenstein como precursor del razonamiento jurídico actual. Acta Psiquiátrica y Psicológica de América Latina, 71(1), 31-36.
Macbeth, G. et al. (2024). El razonamiento jurídico en Wittgenstein. XVI Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología. XXXI Jornadas de Investigación. XX Encuentro de Investigadores en Psicología del MERCOSUR. VI Encuentro de Investigación de Terapia Ocupacional. VI Encuentro de Musicoterapia. https://www.aacademica.org/000-048/762.
Macbeth, G. y Razumiejczyk, E. (2022). El auditorio universal en la Corte Suprema de Justicia argentina. Acta Psiquiátrica y Psicológica de América Latina, 68(3). https://tinyurl.com/53kjd5mj.
Macbeth, G., Razumiejczyk, E. y Fernández, H. (2019). Análisis lingüístico-cognitivo del derecho como sistema de reglas en discursos de la Corte Suprema de Justicia Argentina. 1.° Congreso Internacional de Ciencias Humanas-Humanidades entre pasado y futuro. https://www.aacademica.org/1.congreso.internacional.de.ciencias.humanas/1639.pdf.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk: Transcription format and programs, vol. 1, 3rd ed. (pp. xi, 366). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Mandler, J. M. y Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 111-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90006-8.
Mandler, J. M. y Orlich, F. (1993). Analogical transfer: The roles of schema abstraction and awareness. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(5), 485-487.
Manning, C. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. The MIT Press. https://tinyurl.com/bdbp2x27.
Markman, A. B. y Stilwell, C. H. (2001). Role-governed categories. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 13(4), 329-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528130110100252.
Martin, J. R. (2003). Technicality and abstraction: Language for the creation of specialized texts. En Writing science (pp. 223-241). Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/27vjejmd.
Mason, J. M. y Kendall, J. R. (1978). Facilitating Reading Comprehension through Text Structure Manipulation. Technical Report N.° 92. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED157041.
Matamala, A. (2022). Easy-to-understand language in audiovisual translation and accessibility: State of the art and future challenges. X Linguae, 130-144.
McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639-646.
McNamara, D. S. et al. (1996). Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158.
Miller, G. A. (1995). WordNet: A lexical database for English. Commun. ACM, 38(11), 39-41. https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748.
Mitkov, R. (2022). The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://tinyurl.com/2p9rka6k.
Molinari Marotto, C. (1998). Introducción a los modelos cognitivos de la comprensión del lenguaje. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1196021.
Muñoz, Ó. G. (2012). Lectura fácil: Métodos de redacción y evaluación. Real patronato sobre discapacidad. https://tinyurl.com/mrayjmdx.
Murphy, G. (2002). The big book of concepts. MIT Press.
Nomura, M., Skat Nielsen, G. y Tronbacke, B. (2010). Guidelines for easy-to-read materials. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). https://repository.ifla.org/bitstreams/9e8bc5f6-3873-4200-a482-885cfb239722/download.
Oakhill, J. y Cain, K. (2007). Issues of causality in children’s reading comprehension. En Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 47-71). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Oakhill, J., Cain, K. y Elbro, C. (2014). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: A handbook. Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/4wkafvv7.
O’Brien, S. (2003, abril 13). Controlling controlled English. EAMT Workshop: Improving MT through other language technology tools: resources and tools for building MT. EAMT 2003. https://aclanthology.org/2003.eamt-1.12/.
OECD (2015). Students, Computers and Learning. Making the Connection. https://ictlogy.net/bibliography/reports/projects.php?idp=2885&lang=ca.
OECD (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I) The State of Learning and Equity in Education: The State of Learning and Equity in Education. OECD Publishing.
Ogden, C. K. (1930). Basic English: A general introduction with rules and grammar. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2366945/component/file_2366944/content.
Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading (pp. xix, 318). Cambridge University Press.
Omanson, R. C. et al. (1984). Comprehension of texts with unfamiliar versus recently taught words: Assessment of alternative models. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1253-1268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1253.
Ong, W. J. (1987). Oralidad y escritura: Tecnologías de la palabra. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
OpenAI (2023). GPT-4. https://openai.com/es-419/index/gpt-4-research/.
Ophir, E., Nass, C. y Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(37), 15583-15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Parkinson, J. y Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001.
Pearson, P. D., Hansen, J. y Gordon, C. (1979). The effect of background knowledge on young children’s comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11(3), 201-209.
Pennebaker, J. W. et al. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. https://tinyurl.com/5b9nw93v.
Pennebaker, J. W. y Chung, C. K. (2011). Expressive writing and its links to mental and physical health. Oxford Handbook of Health Psychology, 417-437.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability (pp. xiii, 282). Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N. y Oakhill, J. (2005). The Acquisition of Reading Comprehension Skill. En The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227-247). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch13.
Perfetti, C. y Stafura, J. (2014). Word Knowledge in a Theory of Reading Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687.
Petelin, R. (2010). Considering plain language: Issues and initiatives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(2), 205-216.
Pierella, M. P. (2014). El ingreso a la universidad pública: Diversificación de la experiencia estudiantil y procesos de afiliación a la vida institucional. Universidades, (60), 51-62.
Pierella, M. P. et al. (2022). El ingreso en tiempos de pandemia: Experiencias estudiantiles en una universidad pública argentina. Revista del IICE, (51). https://doi.org/10.34096/iice.n51.10680.
Plain Language Association International (PLAIN) (s. f.). What is plain language? https://plainlanguagenetwork.org/plain-language/what-is-plain-language/.
Popkin, S. L. (1994). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. University of Chicago Press.
Posner, G. J. et al. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207.
Rawson, K. A., Thomas, R. C. y Jacoby, L. L. (2015). The Power of Examples: Illustrative Examples Enhance Conceptual Learning of Declarative Concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 483-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9273-3.
Rice, S. (1993). Right words, right places. Wadsworth Pub. Co. http://archive.org/details/rightwordsrightp00rice.
Rozenblit, L. y Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 521-562. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1.
Russell, S. J. y Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Prentice Hall.
Saggion, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence and natural language processing for easy-to-read texts. https://repositori.upf.edu/items/9c8eb171-3d7e-44aa-b630-8666092ea535.
Salmerón, L., García, A. y Vidal-Abarca, E. (2018). The development of adolescents’ comprehension-based Internet reading activities. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 31-39.
Schank, R. (1975). The structure of episodes in memory. En Representation and Understanding (pp. 237-272). Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-108550-6.50014-8.
Schank, R. C. y Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/bdenkxke.
Schriver, K. A. (2017). Plain Language in the US Gains Momentum: 1940-2015. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(4), 343-383. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2765118.
Siddharthan, A. (2004). Syntactic simplification and Text Cohesion. https://abdn.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/syntactic-simplification-and-text-cohesion-2/.
Siddharthan, A. (2006). Syntactic Simplification and Text Cohesion. Research on Language and Computation, 4(1), 77-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-006-9011-1.
Siddharthan, A. (2011). Text simplification using typed dependencies: A comparision of the robustness of different generation strategies. Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, 2-11. https://aclanthology.org/W11-2802.pdf.
Siddharthan, A. (2014). A survey of research on text simplification. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 165(2), 259-298. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.165.2.06sid.
Siddharthan, A. y Mandya, A. (2014). Hybrid text simplification using synchronous dependency grammars with hand-written and automatically harvested rules. En S. Wintner, S. Goldwater y S. Riezler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 722-731). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/E14-1076.
Singer, L. M. y Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007-1041. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961.
Specia, L. (2010). Translating from Complex to Simplified Sentences. En T. A. S. Pardo, A. Branco, A. Klautau, R. Vieira y V. L. S. de Lima (Eds.), Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language (pp. 30-39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12320-7_5.
Spyridakis, J. H. y Isakson, C. S. (1998). Nominalizations vs. Denominalizations: Do They Influence What Readers Recall? Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 28(2), 163-188. https://doi.org/10.2190/01HD-MHU1-QNX9-R3YE.
Srikanth, N. y Li, J. J. (2021). Elaborative Simplification: Content Addition and Explanation Generation in Text Simplification (arXiv:2010.10035). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.10035.
Stanovich, K. E. (2009). What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought. Yale University Press.
Strunk, W. (1920). The elements of style. New York, Harcourt, Brace. http://archive.org/details/cu31924014450716.
Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7.
Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. En Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 29-47). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.004.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P. y Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4.
Sweller, J. et al. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 119(2), 176-192.
Szigriszt Pazos, F. (1993). Sistemas predictivos de legilibilidad del mensaje escrito: Fórmula de perspicuidad. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Servicio de Publicaciones. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/62699.
Tausczik, Y. R. y Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676.
Toffler, A. (1972). El “shock” del futuro. Plaza & Janés. https://www.academia.edu/download/124649795/06._Alvin_Toffler_El_shock_del_futuro.pdf.
Tong, X. et al. (2026). The influence of text complexity on the relationship between syntactic awareness and reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 126.
Trabasso, T., Secco, T. y van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. En H. Mandl, N. L. Stein y T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and Comprehension of Text. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Turkle, S. (2016). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin Publishing Group.
UNESCO (s. f.). Right to information. https://www.unesco.org/en/right-information.
United Nations (s. f.). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.
van Dijk, T. A. y Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press New York.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Power. Macmillan Education UK.
Vecchiato, S. (2022). Clear, easy, plain, and simple as keywords for text simplification. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.1042258.
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and instruction, 4(1), 45-69.
Williams, J. M. (2009). Style: Toward Clarity and Grace. University of Chicago Press.
Williams, J. M. (2010). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace. Boston: Longman. http://archive.org/details/stylelessonsincl0000will.
Wissman, K. T. et al. (2023). Enhancing declarative concept application: The utility of examples as primary targets of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 29(2), 341-357.
Woodsend, K. y Lapata, M. (2011). Learning to Simplify Sentences with Quasi-Synchronous Grammar and Integer Programming. En R. Barzilay y M. Johnson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 409-420). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/D11-1038/.
Wubben, S., van den Bosch, A. y Krahmer, E. (2012). Sentence Simplification by Monolingual Machine Translation. En H. Li, C.-Y. Lin, M. Osborne, G. G. Lee y J. C. Park (Eds.), Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 1015-1024). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/P12-1107/.
Zamary, A. S. (2019). Evaluating the Dual-Route and Recruitment Hypotheses: Utilizing Both Definitions and Examples for Supporting Declarative Concept Application. Kent State University. https://tinyurl.com/4czyp3vs.
Zhu, Z., Bernhard, D. y Gurevych, I. (2010). A monolingual tree-based translation model for sentence simplification. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2010), 1353-1361. https://aclanthology.org/C10-1152.pdf.
Zwaan, R. A. (2016). Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1028-1034. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0864-x.
Zwaan, R. A. y Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162.
